MissionLab demo

One product. Four academic entry points.

Choose the audience first. The spacecraft model remains shared; the theory depth, controls, evidence and engineering expectations change.

Guided mission learning

Explorer · Grades 6–8

A prediction, a short Digital Twin investigation, visible evidence and an age-appropriate engineering decision.

Evidence: Graph, explanation and mission result

Quantitative practical STEM

Builder · Grades 9–10

Controlled comparisons, calculations, telemetry plots and explicit model-versus-measurement boundaries.

Evidence: Calculations, plots and comparison

Systems thinking and trade studies

Engineer · Grades 11–12

Configuration, constraints, uncertainty, mission policy and evidence-backed recommendations.

Evidence: Engineering memo and trade rationale

Digital Twin, Mission Control and V&V

Mission Systems · University

The professional Digital Twin workspace, Mission Control capability, model identity, provenance, comparison and V&V-style conclusions.

Evidence: Requirements, test and evidence matrix

Choose a guided commercial demo

The academic paths above are public, self-serve software examples. A guided demo scopes the institution's objectives, participants and evaluation questions with CubeSTEM.

MissionLab School Pilot

Schools and STEM programmes. Start with public software, then discuss the bounded pilot or evaluation that fits your setting.

University Digital Twin Lab

University faculty and laboratories. Start with public software, then discuss the bounded pilot or evaluation that fits your setting.

Professional Digital Twin Evaluation

Engineering teams and research laboratories. Start with public software, then discuss the bounded pilot or evaluation that fits your setting.

KidSAT Hardware Extension · optional

For institutions considering supervised physical training. Explore the packages and discuss the operator, site, training and acceptance scope in a guided demo.

1 · Frame

Start with the learning objective

Map the institution’s objective to a mission question, expected evidence and appropriate academic depth.

2 · Run

Show one mission decision

Predict first, run a bounded comparison, inspect evidence and make a decision. Do not imply that software evidence was physically measured.

3 · Extend

Choose the right next step

Discuss a programme, Digital Twin engineering use or optional supervised hardware only after the software story is clear.

University integration truth

The current product includes a runnable Digital Twin workspace, Mission Control and a versioned Developer API with TypeScript, Python and Jupyter source clients for explicitly enabled local/private evaluation. A standardized six-lab teaching sequence is still being packaged. A stable production-public API, browser credential flow, arbitrary hosted code execution and research-grade hardware access are not offered by this page.